Friday, 24 April 2015
Labour to ditch GCSE move 14-19
Labour could ditch GCSEs within 10 years, says Tristram Hunt
http://gu.com/p/47mjf
Thursday, 23 April 2015
Chinese school bars windows and balconies to stop pupil suicides
Chinese school bars windows and balconies to stop pupil suicides http://gu.com/p/47md4
Sunday, 5 April 2015
Germany's system
Very few teachers in Germany quit. If they do, it's usually due to workload
http://gu.com/p/476e4
Saturday, 4 April 2015
League tables, testing, Ofsted and inequalities
School league tables raise pupils' stress but fail to reduce attainment gaps
http://gu.com/p/478kx
Tuesday, 31 March 2015
Finland teacher selection system
Q: What makes Finnish teachers so special? A: It’s not brains
http://gu.com/p/4735e
Monday, 30 March 2015
Humanities dying in HE while Chinese embrace it
Long article, the main bit that stands out being the note on how just 10% of Chinese graduates are considered employable by multinationals as they lack creativity.
The war against humanities at Britain's universities http://gu.com/p/47xc4
Tuesday, 24 March 2015
Tomlinson on why 14-19 failed: Blair veto, too complex
Excerpt:
He is now less inclined to hold back. Labour adopted a version of his proposed diploma but only for vocational studies and therefore without the “unified framework” for post-14 education that was fundamental to his report. The diploma never caught on and was soon dropped. “It was doomed from the start,” Tomlinson says. “It was far too complicated and, except in engineering, employers weren’t sufficiently engaged. Once these matters get into the hands of civil servants, you get very key things not being delivered as they should.” He is not impressed by Michael Gove’s EBacc. “It doesn’t give employers any idea of the skills developed – and lack of skills is what bothers employers more than anything.”Full article.
The problem, I venture, is that traditional academic success is still what parents, teachers and pupils aspire to. Vocational learning comes nowhere near parity of esteem. “Parity of esteem is a nonsense term,” Tomlinson replies. “An A-level in Latin or Greek is not the same as a qualification in engineering or construction. What matters is that qualifications are credible in their own right with the end-user, not by comparison with some other yardstick. Equivalences between A-levels and vocational courses are wrong. We need high-quality technical and vocational routes at 14-plus, as other European countries have.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)